Latest News

Survey: Recycling ‘Too Much Effort’ For Most South Africans

Recycling - Survey: Recycling ‘Too Much Effort’ For Most South Africans

Data from a new survey tapping into the public’s attitudes towards recycling has revealed that the majority of working and middle-class South Africans simply find recycling too much effort.

In the largest consumer
research in South Africa of its kind, almost 1,000 adults – mostly from major
cities in South Africa, but including peri-urban and rural areas – spanning
living standard measures (LSM) one to 10 were quizzed.

Insights from the research will assist PETCO – the organisation
overseeing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) reuse and recycling in South Africa
– in its long-term strategy of improving South Africans’ recycling habits,
specifically when it comes to PET plastic, commonly used to produce plastic

“PETCO has undertaken extensive research to understand and unpack
South African consumer perceptions and attitudes towards recycling,” said PETCO
CEO Cheri Scholtz.  “Our most recent
research shows that recycling behaviour among South Africans is still quite
limited. While the results show that recycling habits are becoming more
mainstream, almost a third of the South Africans interviewed do not recycle at

“Many consumers are apathetic and indifferent about why they should
recycle. Our research further shows that different economic groups are
differently motivated to recycle.”

According to the research, respondents representing LSM one to three
indicated that their incentives to recycle were economically aligned, with
their experience of recycling being that it created jobs and was therefore good
for the economy.

Respondents representing LSM four to 10 were, in turn, motivated by
environmental factors. This, they indicated, was because recycling minimised
waste, saved energy and helped combat climate change. Their biggest barriers to
recycling were a lack of facilities and space to store the items within the
home and a lack of understanding of where to take recyclables once they were separated
from general household waste.

There was additionally a high level of confusion around what the various
polymer identification codes meant, the research indicates.

“Most consumers interviewed, across all demographics and age-groups,
were simply not motivated to start recycling,” said Scholtz. “Even if they did
want to start recycling, they didn’t know how to start, what to do with their
recyclables, where to take them, or whether recycling was worthwhile or not [not
knowing what is done with the post-consumer recyclables].”

Findings from low-income respondents (LSM 1-3):

Respondents said they first became aware of recycling from waste
collectors in their suburbs, as well as through friends and family. Major
barriers to recycling, they said, was a lack of storage space at home and the
absence of “easily accessible” recycling depots.

The group showed a decrease in recycling from PETCO’s previous
survey in 2017. More than half of the respondents indicated that they did not
recycle, and more than a third showed no interest to do so – either now or in
the future. More than two-thirds also viewed recycling as hard work, indicating
it was easier to just throw recyclable items away. 

Respondents aged 18 to 24 in this LSM group made up the largest
count of non-recyclers.

Findings from middle-income respondents (LSM 4-6):

The benefits of recycling, according to the middle-income
respondents, were mainly environmental (53%), with economic factors such as job
creation and the reuse of household items also listed as top benefits.

Although there was a positive disposition towards recycling, the
levels of recycling were lacklustre, the research shows. Overall, almost
two-thirds of these respondents did not recycle.

Findings from high-income respondents (LSM 7-10):

Among the high-income group, 43% of respondents claimed to be
recyclers, 29% said they were “occasional recyclers” and 28% did not recycle at
all. The main benefit of recycling as cited by high-income respondents was
environmental, with 81% agreeing that recycling was “no longer optional”.

They cited traditional media sources (TV, newspapers, radio and
magazines) as the main communicators creating awareness of recycling, with
social media the next most prevalent information stream.

Education “of utmost importance”:

“The need for greater recycling education is of utmost importance to turn this situation around,” said Scholtz. “Specifically, consumers do not understand how technologically advanced and sophisticated the PET plastic bottle recycling process in South Africa is.

“They are not aware that PET plastic is 100% recyclable when basic
design principles are adhered to, or that recycled PET can be used to make many
new products, such as stuffing for duvets and pillows, or polyester fibre for
jeans and T-shirts, or serve as raw material for a brand new PET bottle.”

In 2018 alone 98,649 tonnes of post-consumer PET plastic bottles
were recycled under PETCO’s watch, saving 612,000 cubic metres of landfill
space and lessening the country’s carbon emissions footprint by 148,000 tonnes.

“Greater awareness should also be created around the fact that the
lives of many South Africans are being changed for the better through the local
beneficiation of PET bottle recycling in the country.” Through PETCO’s efforts an average of 6.2
million PET plastic bottles were collected for recycling across South Africa
every day in 2018, creating 68,000 income-generating opportunities for small
and micro-collectors – up from the 64,000 total for 2017, Scholtz said.

The post Survey: Recycling ‘Too Much Effort’ For Most South Africans appeared first on

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *